The recent wave of randomized trials in development economics has provoked criticisms regarding external validity and the neglect of political economy. We investigate these concerns in a randomized trial designed to assess the prospects for scaling-up a contract teacher intervention in Kenya, previously shown to raise test scores for primary students in Western Kenya and various locations in India. The intervention was implemented in parallel in all eight Kenyan provinces by a non-governmental organization (NGO) and the Kenyan government. Institutional differences had large effects on contract teacher performance. We nd a signicant, positive effect of 0.19 standard deviations on math and English scores in schools randomly assigned to NGO implementation, and zero effect in schools receiving contract teachers from the Ministry of Education. We discuss political economy factors underlying this disparity, and suggest the need for future work on scaling up proven interventions to work within public sector institutions.
A new paper by Bold, Kimenyi, Mwabu, Ng’ang’a and Sandefur.
30 Responses
Hey admin your sharing way is unique. This is fantastic site.I enjoyed reading your articles. This is truly a great read for me.
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
Excellent paper! The answer, though, is not to run back into Plato’s cave of ignorance. Rather we must radically change how RCTs are used and (more importantly) the institutional environment in which they operate.
Here’s my simplistic model:
Impact = technical fix + implementation to make it happen
The results-based financing movement helps do this. It changes the goal posts from the process (the RCT’ed program) to the actual outcomes and impact desired. It encourages investment in implementation, rapid learning and adaptation to complex, evolving environments. Sure, results-based financing is not a panacea for every program nor every problem, but it can be a game-changer in areas with measurable, clearly defined outcomes.
The point is taken, though, that if the institutional environment doesn’t want results, then results-based financing will be dead on arrival. Indeed, this likely explains why results-based financing has (mostly) been limited in Donor-land. National-level social programs (where most of the money is at) are still overly focused on process and inputs, rather than the actual outcomes desired.
Here, conveners (CGD) and funders (DFID, USAID,etc) can be catalyzing agents, supporting local political champions who want to change the system and helping them to do so by connecting them to other political champions in similar situations, and providing rapid-response technical input at critical points in the change process.
-Michael
P.S. An old version of the paper can be found here:
http://www.eea-esem.com/files/papers/eea-esem/2012/2881/2012-02-15%20Kenya%20RCT.pdf
Susan Ngongi liked this on Facebook.
dead link
This is a great empirical result but also completely unsurprising result as there never was any plausible positive theory of education policy formulation and implementation in Kenya in which rigorous knowledge about what works was the key constraint to better policy.
(http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/lpritch/Education%20-%20docs/ED%20-%20Gov%20action/NAPwrong_PolicyIrrelevance_Brookings_final.pdf)
(or, for that matter, in any other place or any other policy domain).
So if now the only available “rigorous” evidence acceptable to the randomista crowd “proves” (with equal rigor to anything being proved by any RCT) that rigorous evidence doesn’t impact policy will the advocates of rigorous evidence be consistent with their own ideology and stop or will they continue their faith based advocacy for more resources for RCTs? I’ll give everyone exactly one guess.
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
Dennis Whittle liked this on Facebook.
Cornelius Ellington Williams liked this on Facebook.
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
The tip of a very large iceberg.
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp
RT @cblatts: The difficulty of generalizing RCT results (the RCT result) http://t.co/CYTD4BKp