I give up.
A few days ago I posted about the psychology replication study that didn’t replicate. Apparently the replication of the replication is quite problematic.
Here is a discussion from Replication Watch, which notes
independent commentaries have also emerged challenging Gilbert and colleagues’ methodology and conclusion by Sanjay Srivastava, Uri Simonsohn, Daniel Lakens, Simine Vazire, Andrew Gelman, David Funder, Rolf Zwaan, and Dorothy Bishop.
I’m sure this is a fascinating and important debate but I have not had time to read these in depth, as I am barely able to answer my emails.
I would love pointers to a simple and relatively unbiased roundup. In the meantime, I felt like I should at least note the controversy.
39 Responses
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
Check out The Replication Network on this. They have a series of posts about this issue. Go to: http://replicationnetwork.com/category/news-events/
.@jflier @afrakt /1 much of the field doesn’t think it does https://t.co/blJ4EaTCIF
psych publication might be hitting meta-level criticality… https://t.co/8zTIjK98zJ
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
Love it!–>That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/8HpMNDXOOX
Rapidly losing faith in psychology and statistics. https://t.co/txB2lbd85i
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate.: I give up. A few days … https://t.co/zFIDwQIV2M
RT @went1955: Controversy: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate — @cblatts — https://t.co/…
Controversy: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate — @cblatts — https://t.co/EXdjVOwQFD
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
“That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate.” https://t.co/0XDrFaTTZM
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
@cblatts yes, & the pay4performance movement wouldn’t be paid on its performance, & PDIA crowd hasn’t adapted to institutional realities
@cblatts @ATabarrok a study replete in replication requires discreet evaluation to prevent complete humiliation.
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @Aelkus: Recursion is everywhere! https://t.co/HETcjZtHuk
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
Recursion is everywhere! https://t.co/HETcjZtHuk
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
“That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate.” https://t.co/mufZ6OxgLQ
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
I think you can pretty much always trust Andrew Gelman on this kind of thing.
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth
RT @cblatts: That replication of the replication study that didn’t replicate? It doesn’t replicate. https://t.co/Bbz5M8pRth