Those are really positions regarding whether we should believe in the existence of the unobservable entities posited by our best theories, *one of the many* questions examined by philosophers of science. (The descriptions of the main views aren’t fully accurate, but it’s hard to give such a description in so little space).
26 Responses
MT Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/sHW2qQVzZh via @cblatts @KateinLeeds http://t.co/sFz0bdDJGT
Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/3ibjMalbc9 via @cblatts One for @realisteval folk? http://t.co/s3x7E3yuqX
Positions in the philosophy of science – Chris Blattman http://t.co/7CJWg9MhtQ
Those are really positions regarding whether we should believe in the existence of the unobservable entities posited by our best theories, *one of the many* questions examined by philosophers of science. (The descriptions of the main views aren’t fully accurate, but it’s hard to give such a description in so little space).
Positions in the philosophy of science via @cblatts http://t.co/197u3kUX2R
RT @muranava: Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/xEIW3XiDUv
Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/xEIW3XiDUv
RT @went1955: Graph: Positions in the philosophy of science — Chris Blattman — http://t.co/BvenprWsl9 http://t.co/qoKA5V1C8f
RT @cblatts: Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/LwJFUloQuK
RT @went1955: Graph: Positions in the philosophy of science — Chris Blattman — http://t.co/BvenprWsl9 http://t.co/qoKA5V1C8f
RT @went1955: Graph: Positions in the philosophy of science — Chris Blattman — http://t.co/BvenprWsl9 http://t.co/qoKA5V1C8f
RT @went1955: Graph: Positions in the philosophy of science — Chris Blattman — http://t.co/BvenprWsl9 http://t.co/qoKA5V1C8f
RT @went1955: Graph: Positions in the philosophy of science — Chris Blattman — http://t.co/BvenprWsl9 http://t.co/qoKA5V1C8f
Graph: Positions in the philosophy of science — Chris Blattman — http://t.co/BvenprWsl9 http://t.co/qoKA5V1C8f
RT @robcrilly: Me? I’m with Kuhn. Where are you? http://t.co/izcAUDwJm6 Positions in the philosophy of science
Me? I’m with Kuhn. Where are you? http://t.co/izcAUDwJm6 Positions in the philosophy of science
Positions in the philosophy of science – from @cblatts http://t.co/hgfEdUjoVn
Spent half of this term trying to wrap my mind around positions in the philosophy of science. http://t.co/IzGE17VoQs via @feedly
RT @cblatts: Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/LwJFUloQuK
Positions in the philosophy of science: Via @tslumley
The post Positions in the philosophy of science appear… http://t.co/h8EXBkW9qf
RT @drunkeynesian: Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/zq8MnQbE3p via @feedly
RT @drunkeynesian: Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/zq8MnQbE3p via @feedly
Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/zq8MnQbE3p via @feedly
A chart that summarizes basic positions in the philosophy of science. http://t.co/nJe3LHtB9W My beliefs fall toward the instrumentalist side
RT @cblatts: Positions in the philosophy of science http://t.co/LwJFUloQuK
@cblatts The 10 people with PhD dissertations on the Philosophy of Science clicked your link in rabid hope.
They were all disappointed.