Chris Blattman

Search
Close this search box.

How to create skilled jobs in poor countries? Cash transfers and self-employment in Africa

If you’ve been following the cash transfer debate on this blog, you might have seen my blog post on a paper with a pointy-headed title: “Credit constraints, occupational choice, and the process of development: Evidence from cash transfers in Uganda”.

After many, many comments, and a summer spent on revising the paper, there is a substantially new version with a new title: “Generating skilled employment in developing countries: Experimental evidence from Uganda“.

We study a government program in Uganda designed to help the poor and unemployed become self-employed artisans. The program targeted people ages 16 to 35 in Uganda’s conflict-affected north, inviting them to form groups and submit grant proposals to pay for vocational training and business start-up.

Funding was randomly assigned, and treatment groups received unsupervised cash grants of $382 per member on average. The government’s main aims were to increase in-comes and thus also promote social stability.

The treatment group invests some of the grant in skills training but most in tools and materials. After four years half practice a skilled trade. Relative to the control group, the program increases business assets by 57%, hours of work by 17%, and earnings by 38%.

We see no corresponding impact, however, on individual social cohesion, participation, anti-social behavior, or protest attitudes and participation.

Based on individual earnings alone we estimate 30 to 50% annual returns to investment from the program. We also see evidence that the treatment group grow their enterprises and hire labor, extending the employment impacts of the program.

Impact levels are similar for treatment men and women, but are qualitatively different for women — both because women begin poorer (meaning the impact is larger relative to their starting point), and because women’s enterprises and earnings stagnate without the program but take off after a grant.

The patterns we observe — high rates of investment, new business start-up, and returns on investment — are consistent with able but credit-constrained young people.

The changes reflect lessons learned in journal publishing. Stay tuned for comments.

Download freely here.

6 Responses

  1. Gmail is a server based email portal where you can send or receive messages at on go. As everything has its pros and cons gmail too have it has some issues and bugs while using.. but don’t panic we will teach you how to resolve error related to uploading attachment in gmail

    GMAIL CUSTOMER SUPPORT

  2. TutuApp Download: TutuApp is a third-party app store designed for Android and iOS devices https://tutuappapk.vip/ it is like regular stores likehttps://tutuappapk.vip/tutuapp-vip-ios-iphone/ Play Store or App Store but with some remarkable differences https://tutuappapk.vip/tutuapp-pc-windows/ TutuApp is easily one of the finest third-party stores for iOS. Thankfully, you don’t need https://tutuappapk.vip/fix-tutuapp-not-working/

  3. Interesting stuff Chris.

    Seems like the structuring of the artisan groups plays a pretty large factor in their success. Sizes are fairly (22) large and the loan amounts (avg. $7,500) are pretty sizeable. Are the returns here large enough to attract private investment (microfinance or govt. loans) at lower interest rates than what you typically see in microfinance? Seems that if this is promising enough, instead of grants you could have a loan program that is much closer to being revenue neutral.

    I’d also wonder what types of screening tools could be put in place to further vet entrepreneurial groups, which would increase the ROI even more.

    Great stuff and interested to see where the debate goes in the next 5 years.

  4. Thanks Chris, this is great. I can’t help wondering though what the impact would be without SUTVA at scale?

Why We Fight - Book Cover
Subscribe to Blog