Chris Blattman

Search
Close this search box.

Tribal regimes in academia

Last week I asked why the politics and economics job markets seem to have different equilibria. Henry Farrell points me to an old blog post worth revisiting (link fixed):

Within Class I departments, there’s a good deal of variation across disciplines in the degree of factionalization within the elite departments and the solidarity of the exchange system, as measured by within-class exchanges of students.

Economics has the most cohesive elite faction and its “dominance over the entire discipline is overwhelming.” Class I Psychology departments, by contrast, are considerably more decentralized, with three contending factions.

Different measures bring out different aspects of the structure. Economics scores highest on all exchange-based measures of hierarchy and solidarity.

He’s summarizing a 2003 sociology paper on tribal regimes in academia. Worth a peek. Sadly I do not see an ungated copy.

17 Responses

  1. If you’re interested in this sort of thing, see also Val Burris’s 2004 article “The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks” in American Sociological Review.

Why We Fight - Book Cover
Subscribe to Blog